Bug#893221: knopflerfish-osgi FTBFS with openjdk-9

Felix Natter fnatter at gmx.net
Fri Mar 30 16:41:22 UTC 2018


Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg at apache.org> writes:

hello Emmanuel,

> Le 30/03/2018 à 09:41, Felix Natter a écrit :
>
>> Is the following ok for getting rid of the -java-doc package
>> (I don't think it makes sense to keep an older doc package)?
>> 
>>  Package: libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java
>>  Architecture: all
>>  Depends: ${misc:Depends}
>> -Suggests: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc
>> +Provides: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc
>> +Conflicts: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc
>> +Replaces: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc
>
> libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc has no reverse dependencies, no need to
> add these fields you can drop it directly.

Are you sure? Without these settings, libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc-X
will still be kept if libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java is updated to
Y, thus you have an old doc package lying around.

One important lintian is an FP (#894397)
W: libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java:
incompatible-java-bytecode-format Java9 version (Class format: 53)

Would you want to sponsor this minor update?

knopflerfish-osgi (6.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Drop -java-doc package due to low popcon (Closes: #893221)
  * Correct description (R5->R6)
  * Priority extra->optional
  * Install NOTICE.txt in main package
  * Bump standards version to 4.1.3

 -- Felix Natter <fnatter at gmx.net>  Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:29:18 +0200

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/knopflerfish-osgi.git

Many Thanks and Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter
debian/rules!



More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list