Bug#998054: libxstream-java: vulnerable to CVE-2021-391{{39..41}, {44..54}}
Alex Thiessen
alex.thiessen.de+debian at gmail.com
Fri Oct 29 08:49:02 BST 2021
Package: libxstream-java
Version: 1.4.15-3
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: alex.thiessen.de+debian at gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Package installed, the machine scanned by the IT department and
found vulnerable to a set of CVEs. According to
https://x-stream.github.io/security.html, it's:
- CVE-2021-39139 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack.
- CVE-2021-39140 XStream can cause a Denial of Service.
- CVE-2021-39141 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack.
- CVE-2021-39144 XStream is vulnerable to a Remote Command Execution attack.
- CVE-2021-39145 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack.
- CVE-2021-39146 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack.
- CVE-2021-39147 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack.
- CVE-2021-39148 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack.
- CVE-2021-39149 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack.
- CVE-2021-39150 A Server-Side Forgery Request can be activated unmarshalling with XStream to access data streams from an arbitrary URL referencing a resource in an intranet or the local host.
- CVE-2021-39151 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack.
- CVE-2021-39152 A Server-Side Forgery Request can be activated unmarshalling with XStream to access data streams from an arbitrary URL referencing a resource in an intranet or the local host.
- CVE-2021-39153 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack.
- CVE-2021-39154 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Checked Debian website for security fixes of the package. Checked
the changelog to see if the CVEs were fixed by a patch.
* What was the outcome of this action?
No newer version with CVEs fixed available for Debian stable to
insntall out of the box.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
A package with the CVEs fixed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.1
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: unable to detect
Versions of packages libxstream-java depends on:
ii libxpp3-java 1.1.4c-3
libxstream-java recommends no packages.
Versions of packages libxstream-java suggests:
pn libcglib-nodep-java <none>
pn libdom4j-java <none>
pn libjdom1-java <none>
pn libjdom2-java <none>
pn libjettison-java <none>
pn libjoda-time-java <none>
pn libkxml2-java <none>
pn libwoodstox-java <none>
pn libxom-java <none>
-- no debconf information
More information about the pkg-java-maintainers
mailing list