Bug#1014310: src:openjfx: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on arm64 and armhf

[tony mancill]

Hi Paul,

On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Paul Gevers <elbrus at debian.org> wrote:
> > Your package failed to build from source on arm64 and armhf while it
> > built there successfully in the past.
> 
> I just checked to see if there would be a commit upstream to fix the FTBFS,
> but it seems that upstream is active and is at release 20+1 (from 16 days
> ago), but in a new place (so the debian/watch file isn't working).
> 
> https://github.com/openjdk/jfx

For JDK 11, I believe we want https://github.com/openjdk/jfx11u
For JDK 17, it would be https://github.com/openjdk/jfx17u 
 
> You may want to look into this.

Agreed.  Java Team, should we be targeting OpenJFX 17 for bookworm, or
is an updated build of OpenJFX 11 of use?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20220813/e860538f/attachment.sig>