libodfdom-java_0.9.0~RC2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Markus Koschany]

Am Freitag, dem 07.01.2022 um 01:00 +0000 schrieb Thorsten Alteholz:
> 
> Hi Markus,
> 
> I am bit stuck. LICENSE contains some remarks that third party stuff is added
> to this package.
> 
> I can find text that was taken from the ODF spec (in [1]), so this copyright
> information is missing in any case.

Those messages are part of a specification but the copyright of the file is
Apache 2.0. This is like using <h1></h1> tags in a document, or printing a
novel on DIN A4 sized paper. The tags are part of the HTML language
specification but the document can be licensed under a different copyright.

> But where can I find the MathML-, the MSV- and this isorelax-stuff? A comment
> about this in your debian/copyright would be great.

Ah, I can see where the confusion stems from. I have cloned the complete
repository from

https://github.com/tdf/odftoolkit

but I did only package 

https://github.com/tdf/odftoolkit/tree/master/odfdom

as the Source link states correctly in debian/copyright.

The LICENSE in the root directory is the license file from the complete
odftoolkit repository. The relevant LICENSE file is in the odfdom directory. I
did not package ODF Validator and none of the dependencies which are mentioned
in the LICENSE file are included in this package. I have clarified this with a
comment in d/c. The whole libodfdom-java source package is under the Apache 2.0
license.


Regards,

Markus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20220107/664db9c3/attachment.sig>