Bug#1003972: marked as done (libphonenumber: New upstream release - please update)

[Neil Mayhew]

On 2022-01-28 09:23, tony mancill wrote:
> I'm considering setting parallel=1 for the next upload.  Thoughts?

I think that's a good idea. I seems likely there's a bug in the 
CMakeLists.txt that fails to express a dependency on the code generation 
step, and this is a good workaround for now. If the builders are 
successful with a non-parallel build I can investigate this with less 
urgency.