Bug#1041282: jtreg6 - okay to upload upstream version 6.2+1?

[Vladimir Petko]

Hi,

 Upgrading to 6.2 does not introduce any jtreg regressions in
openjdk-11 and -17.

Best Regards,
  Vladimir.

On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 7:06 AM tony mancill <tmancill at debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:28:39AM +1200, Vladimir Petko wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >  The build.xml is not supported by the upstream, so I have updated the
> > patch to include rule changes to use the provided Makefile[1].
> >
> > Changes:
> >   * Use Makefile to build jtreg (LP: #2031041).
> >     - Use --release option in Makefile compile options.
> >     - d/p/*: drop build.xml patches.
> >     - d/control: add libguice-java, zip.
>
> Hello Vladimir, hi Emmanuel:
>
> Vladimir, thank you for this patch (and others).  I applied it to the
> current source repo and rebuild all of the build r-deps before I
> realized that the source repo contains 6.2+1 [1] (not 6.1+2), which
> hasn't been uploaded.
>
> Are there any considerations or concerns about going ahead with an
> upload of 6.2+1?  As I said, I was able to build openjdk-11, -17, and
> -19 with that version.
>
> Thanks,
> tony
>
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jtreg/-/commit/18fe40fc470b04bc735b425bba250db61340fcb3