[Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding impress.js_0.5.3-1_amd64.changes

[Ansgar Burchardt]

Cédric Boutillier <boutil at debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:03:48PM +0000, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> why does d/copyright say "Expat or GPL-2+"? The upstream sources contain a
>> notice saying "Released under the MIT and GPL Licenses." (i.e. any version of
>> the GPL).
>
>> Note that "MIT License" might refer to one of several licenses.
>
>> It would probably be best if upstream included the full text of the licenses to
>> avoid any uncertainties.
>
> As indicated in the Comment field of the debian/copyright file,
> referring to the following url:
> https://github.com/bartaz/impress.js/issues/225
> I asked upstream some clarification about the license. The answer has
> been what is mentionned in the copyright file: GPL-2+ or Expat.

Ah, sorry. I somehow missed the Comments field.

Ansgar