[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#731095: Please consider switching tablesorter to alternate upstream
Jerome Charaoui
jerome at riseup.net
Mon Feb 3 17:37:22 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Le 2014-02-02 17:09, Iustin Pop a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:54:17PM -0500, Jerome Charaoui wrote:
>> Several packages in Debian depend on libjs-jquery-tablesorter.
>> Are you confident that switching to a fork wouldn't negatively
>> impact these packages?
>
> I'm definitely not confident of this, as I'm not familiar with the
> javascript packaging/versioning/upgrades policy. Hence why I asked
> the maintainer to _investigate_ this situation, as they have
> better knowledge than me on this front, not to simply switch over.
I was asking in regards to the tablesorter plugin itself, not Debian
policies, in the hope that you may be familiar with the differences
between the two. Is the fork a drop-in replacement for the original
plugin? Did it introduce incompatible changes, such as removing
methods or properties? Etc.
Thanks,
-- Jerome
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS79PSAAoJEK/ZGpI6kvtMw/EIAIc3c/I5Dz16SjoxD5s6BvUa
O0MJkmw8XHChBzkx+R+Q26GvIegC0SB0AQQ5ZFcM+/BBaKe9DPSTTOew3cKX8ho6
mhwpmdC+zYOqKzo5As4BQloec29qH5f4fX4JSA2KXLGwE7GirE9axhE5pyi/+2xq
54TjpJtBeeYFTyEHFw6b1bjqfcJKcxSireL7X8KZRSSOvUKdUn5F4gv0hFTcIxLx
u4vfaDZB6+iGVNHtnSDke2fHWAtVzV/FdjzLQ8Xa8DnnmkRrVzfEyKmJBf8L2cg1
fwG26IZgN5BDUvJdgRK/bv9k6VqCpgXZVjNZnRvQCu4eDpCtNvb5C4kk1EXgXU4=
=GFbS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel
mailing list