[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#731095: Please consider switching tablesorter to alternate upstream

Jerome Charaoui jerome at riseup.net
Mon Feb 3 17:37:22 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Le 2014-02-02 17:09, Iustin Pop a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:54:17PM -0500, Jerome Charaoui wrote:
>> Several packages in Debian depend on libjs-jquery-tablesorter.
>> Are you confident that switching to a fork wouldn't negatively
>> impact these packages?
> 
> I'm definitely not confident of this, as I'm not familiar with the 
> javascript packaging/versioning/upgrades policy. Hence why I asked
> the maintainer to _investigate_ this situation, as they have
> better knowledge than me on this front, not to simply switch over.

I was asking in regards to the tablesorter plugin itself, not Debian
policies, in the hope that you may be familiar with the differences
between the two. Is the fork a drop-in replacement for the original
plugin? Did it introduce incompatible changes, such as removing
methods or properties? Etc.

Thanks,

 -- Jerome


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS79PSAAoJEK/ZGpI6kvtMw/EIAIc3c/I5Dz16SjoxD5s6BvUa
O0MJkmw8XHChBzkx+R+Q26GvIegC0SB0AQQ5ZFcM+/BBaKe9DPSTTOew3cKX8ho6
mhwpmdC+zYOqKzo5As4BQloec29qH5f4fX4JSA2KXLGwE7GirE9axhE5pyi/+2xq
54TjpJtBeeYFTyEHFw6b1bjqfcJKcxSireL7X8KZRSSOvUKdUn5F4gv0hFTcIxLx
u4vfaDZB6+iGVNHtnSDke2fHWAtVzV/FdjzLQ8Xa8DnnmkRrVzfEyKmJBf8L2cg1
fwG26IZgN5BDUvJdgRK/bv9k6VqCpgXZVjNZnRvQCu4eDpCtNvb5C4kk1EXgXU4=
=GFbS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list