[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#734763: Bug#734763: Please update libjs-jquery-cookie and use upstream numbering
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Fri Jan 31 18:09:27 UTC 2014
Quoting Jerome Charaoui (2014-01-31 16:12:44)
> Le 2014-01-31 06:36, Daniel James a écrit :
>> Thanks for the reply. I have checked the list above, and only galette
>> depends on a specific version of libjs-jquery-cookie, in this case
>> (>= 8).
>>
>> I guess the current version numbering was chosen because the source
>> package jquery-goodies contains many different libraries, with a
>> variety of upstream version numbers. Would it be a lot more work to
>> create a source package for each of the 23 binary packages?
>
> Well, yes, it would be a lot of work. And I'm quite certain the
> official javascript packaging team would disagree to split
> jquery-goodies.
We do not as a team mandate bundling of jQuery addons.
I have no problem with splitting out addons as needed.
> But, I think switching to upstream numbering is still possible. by
> using an epoch number. The new version number for libjs-jquery-cookie
> would be 1:1.4.0 (epoch 1) which would be more recent than 8-2 (epoch
> 0). Generating a binary package with a different version number than
> the source package is definitely possible.
Whoa - either the package version is relevant or it isn't.
Sounds to me that a bundle package cannot have a version that indicates
versions of each of the bundled parts, and it is *not* sensible to throw
an epoch to try please just one piece of the bundle.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 966 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20140131/4f5aa7b7/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel
mailing list