[Pkg-javascript-devel] whether or not to sometimes remove questionably useful binaries from node modules

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Tue Jul 1 14:40:58 UTC 2014


Quoting Jérémy Lal (2014-07-01 16:35:59)
> Andrew, modifications you make to the upstream files are supposed to 
> be done in one of two ways (and directly removing files from the gbp 
> repository is not a way):
> 
> - repackage upstream tarball to exclude files for DFSG reasons
> The simplest way to do that is through [0] and uscan. The fact a 
> upstream tarball was repackaged is advertised in the version of the 
> debian package, like 3.0.1+dfsg-1

...and if doing above, you also must mention in debian/copyright which 
files were stripped.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20140701/d9250bb7/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list