[Pkg-javascript-devel] JS policy: repackaging upstream tarball when minified js files are present (was: Call for review: should.js packages)
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Wed May 7 11:41:20 UTC 2014
Quoting Emilien Klein (2014-05-07 09:08:11)
> 2014-05-06 7:58 GMT+02:00 Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org>:
>> Le mardi 06 mai 2014 à 02:57 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>>> Quoting Emilien Klein (2014-05-05 23:35:34)
>>>> 2014-05-05 21:31 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk>:
>>>>> Quoting Emilien Klein (2014-05-05 20:57:39)
>>>>>> Or do we really want to have this debate started again for each
>>>>>> new package asking the team to be reviewed?
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe we need not have same debate for each new package, if we
>>>>> document what we (or most of us) find to be best practices.
>>>>
>>>> What is your suggestion for documenting that?
>>>
>>> Somewhere below <https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript>.
>>>
>>> If calling the page "Policy" implies strict rules, then I would
>>> prefer not writing it there but instead at e.g. Guidelines or
>>> BestPractices.
> I guess I understand my confusion now:
> In the debate last 2 months, there were some pretty strong arguments
> advanced why keeping the minified files was breaking the social
> contract (and thus RC-worthy)
> I looks like now that it is not necessarily as black and white.
That has not changed: Some (including me) pretty strongly believe that
keeping the minified files (not breaks not the social contract but) is
in violation of Debian Policy and thus worthy of release-candidate bugs.
It is up to those choosing not to follow guidelines to defend their
reasoning that that is not the case. Just as before.
> Let's thus keep this as a recommendation/guideline/best practice for
> our team, and see how/if the debate comes to a resolution at the level
> of the entire project.
Please note that I only claim guidelines can *help* avoid discussion -
by either a) clearly documenting what is safe to do if you don't want
trouble, or b) summarizing the essentials of one half of the debate -
ideally cutting future threads in half. Imagine threads where half the
posts are shrunk to stuff like "How is your $foo compliant with Debian
Policy §§x.y? Point $bar in our guideline addresses that.".
> Who can put Jérémy's text at the location Jonas mentions?
Anyone understanding how "wiki" works and able to get a wiki.debian.org
user account. :-)
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 966 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20140507/171eee05/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel
mailing list