[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#742347: Bug#742347: tilemill vs mapbox studio?

[Jérémy Lal]

2015-11-05 17:04 GMT+01:00 Bas Couwenberg <sebastic at xs4all.nl>:

> On 2015-11-05 16:59, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
>> On 2015-11-05 09:52:19, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>
>>> The openstreetmap-carto developers have mostly switched to kosmtic:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik
>>>
>>
>> is that a fork of tilemill? how does it differ?
>>
>
> It's not a fork. It's not a Mapbox project.
>
> maybe a new ITP should be opened for this then?
>>
>
> It's still alpha, but shows much more promise than mapbox-studio as an
> alternative to tilemill.
>
> If you want to spend time packaging an alternative for tilemill, I think
> kosmtik is your best option.
>
>
Indeed it looks like an alternative to tilemill.
Mapbox studio classic is not really as good, and to be released mapbox
studio (but i don't know when)
is very promising.


Jérémy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20151105/c9561042/attachment.html>