[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-babel_6.25.0+dfsg-13_amd64.changes REJECTED
Pirate Praveen
praveen at onenetbeyond.org
Tue Oct 10 07:07:26 UTC 2017
On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 12:31 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote:
> No.
>
> Pirate, please read over the following extremely carefully before replying
> as I would like to avoid either of us becoming frustrated by these repeated
> failures at conversation.
>
> The situation, as I understand it, is as follows:
>
> a) You uploaded 6.25.0+dfsg-13 with a debian/copyright including the
> following:
>
> 11 Files: packages/babel-preset-es2015/test/fixtures/traceur/*
> 12 Copyright: [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
> 13 License: Apache-2.0
> 14 Comment: name of copyright holder is missing
>
> b) This "[yyyy] [name of copyright owner]" placeholder text comes
> from the LICENSE file.
>
> c) The portion of the LICENSE file where it comes from is part of
> the usual "How to apply this license to your own code." This is
> what was meant by "meta statement" in my original REJECT.
>
> d) The statement in debian/copyright therefore has no meaning
> whatsover, likely just a false positive from whatever tool you
> are using to generate such files.
>
> e) (It is therefore totally irrelevant to this disuss whether the
> tests are used, whether the package is "useful", whether its
> packages in NEW or contrib depend on it, etc. You seem fixated
> on this point.)
I have suggested two possible solutions and you seem to be fixated on
the semantics of the problem than a solution.
Now with those files removed from the source tarball, lets move on.
Please see if the current uploads in NEW meets the criteria.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20171010/efd536e5/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel
mailing list