[Pkg-javascript-devel] three.js_80+dfsg2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Pirate Praveen]

On വെള്ളി 02 മാർച്ച് 2018 02:00 വൈകു, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> But if you continously "run into the same wall", then it does not do any
> good to assume its that one person hating you and that, if you happen to
> get to another team member, they will like you. It's the wrong mindset.

This is based on my past experience with multiple packages where same
criteria was interpreted differently by different ftp masters (At least
3 cases I can quote 1. node-babel-preset-env was rejected but
node-rollup was accepted, both can't be bootstrapped without a binary
upload first. 2. I was asked to make a single handlebars package, by
waldi, but it was accepted by Chris 3. There was long discussion on
node-babel but it was easily resolved when another ftp master was involved).

> Also, possibly we should adjust our communications here, at least get
> others to respond/jump in (earlier). Not sure we need it so much formal
> as Ian wrote down, but get someone else in early shouldn't hurt.
>
Thanks.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20180302/a4a368a0/attachment.sig>