[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#934141: jsbeautifier and node-js-beautify should provide alternatives
    Xavier 
    yadd at debian.org
       
    Wed Aug  7 18:13:06 BST 2019
    
    
  
Le 07/08/2019 à 14:56, Xavier Guimard a écrit :
> Package: jsbeautifier
> Version: 1.6.4-7
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> both jsbeautifier and node-js-beautify come from the same upstream
> source, the first provides js-beautify and the second html-beautify and
> css-beautify. This crazy situation should be solved by an "alternative" to
> provides the 3 scripts.
> 
> Cheers,
> Xavier
This situation follows https://bugs.debian.org/888903 in which it was
decided to keep /usr/bin/js-beautify in jsbeautifier (previously
packaged) even if node-js-beautify provided /usr/bin/html-beautify and
/usr/bin/css-beautify.
Upstream source provides both Python and JavaScript code to build these
binaries, same name, same algorithm, same options but different languages.
    
    
More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel
mailing list