[Pkg-javascript-devel] Suggestions on ruby-task-list and node-deckar01-task-list

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-08-14 19:08:47)
> Hi ruby and js teams,
> 
> task_list project [1] provides both ruby and nodejs code from the same 
> repo. Currently only ruby-task-list binary package is created. I added 
> a new binary package node-deckar01-task-list for the nodejs code, but 
> it was rejected by ftp masters [2].

Did you quote ftpmaster in full in that referenced post written by you?


> They think we should not add a new binary package for this case and 
> instead should use a Provides field and a single binary package.

Do they?  In what you reference above I only see Ftpmaster saying "We've 
talked about this." which can frankly mean a lot of different things.


> I don't agree with their decision, but the only option I have to 
> challenege it is a GR.

You mean you have already tried the route of going to the technical 
committee, and asking for the opinion of the DPL?  Or am I missing 
something making those options a no-go?

Whichever options available, I think it would be helpful with the 
opinions of stakeholders more clearly laid out - i.e. more than quoting 
ftpmasters for saying "We've talked about this." and you taking 
responsibility for explaining what that's supposed to mean.


Thanks for your work on this,

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private