[Pkg-javascript-devel] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? RFS: node-js-beautify 1.7.5+dfsg-2

Xavier yadd at debian.org
Fri Feb 1 15:59:38 GMT 2019


Le Vendredi, Février 01, 2019 16:49 CET, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas at jones.dk> a écrit: 
 
> Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 16:30:01)
> > Le 01/02/2019 à 15:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 15:16:39)
> > >> Le 01/02/2019 à 14:57, Paolo Greppi a écrit :
> > >>> Hi, I have prepared an update to node-js-beautify to close this bug quickly:
> > >>> http://bugs.debian.org/888903
> > >>>
> > >>> I have opted for not updating it to 1.8.9 because ATM its build-rdepends node-postcss is at version 6.0.23 which we know work fine with js-beautify 1.7.5.
> > >>> When we update node-postcss we can update node-js-beautify as well.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please someone sponsor the upload:
> > >>> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-js-beautify
> > >>>
> > >>> Paolo
> > >>
> > >> I added minimal test during build. Is it OK for the team to rename
> > >> js-beautify to js-beautify2 ?
> > > > > If you mean the executable, then please simply avoid installing instead: > > We can then consider later - without stress - if needed at all and if so > > which of them is more suitably renamed).
> > > > > If you mean package name then not now, then please don't: That will end > > in NEW queue which is too risky at this late date!
> > > > >  - Jonas
> > > See changes, Paolo modified only /usr/bin/js-beautify to
> > /usr/bin/js-beautify2 of course
> 
> And I say please don't do that!
> 
>  - Jonas

I fully agree with you, that's why I put this discussion here ;-)




More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list