[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976341: Bug#976341: Bug#976341: node-jest: please provide real (not virtual) package node-jest-worker

[Xavier]

Le 04/12/2020 à 15:32, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-04 11:48:58)
>> Le 03/12/2020 à 19:05, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-03 18:30:54)
>>>> Le 03/12/2020 à 18:07, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>>>>> Please provide real (not virtual) package node-jest-worker, and 
>>>>> have jest depend on or recommend that, as appropriate.
> 
> [...]
> 
>> node-babel7 does provide versioned virtual packages (like acorn).
> 
> You are right: I failed to check correctly versioning.  apt and aptitude 
> apparently does *not* show version for virtual packages (I thought so, 
> and I thought I had checked that with node-types-uuid).
> 
> This works:
> 
>   apt-cache showpkg node-types-babel-code-frame | grep '^[a-z]'
> 
> This also works, and is more flexible to e.g. reveal that 3 node-types-* 
> packages do not provide version:
> 
>   sudo sync-available
>   grep-available -FProvides -sProvides node-types- | grep -Po '\bnode-types-[^,]+'

I didn't know those tips, thanks!

> This should also work flexibly and more elegant, but doesn't for me (not 
> sure why):
> 
>   grep-status --field=Provides -sProvides node-types-babel-code-frame
> 
> 
>> I'll study if node-babel7 can be split into multiple packages. It took 
>> me around 4 hours to split jest correctly...
>>
>> Done for jest, waiting for ftpmaster review.
> 
> Thanks!

Note that I didn't succeed to split node-expect, it is really mixed into
other jest modules (!= node-expect.js). See (incomplete)
https://people.debian.org/~yadd/jest-spaghetti-dish.png.

So I think using mocha+expect is a bad thing, prefer to use jest
directly (just to set test file paths: `jest --ci --testRegex
test/*.test-files.js`).