[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976409: glibc breaks node-iconv autopkgtest: AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Missing expected exception

Xavier yadd at debian.org
Fri Dec 4 20:38:12 GMT 2020


Control: tags -1 + ftbfs

Le 04/12/2020 à 20:46, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Source: glibc, node-iconv
> Control: found -1 glibc/2.31-5
> Control: found -1 node-iconv/2.3.5-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bullseye
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ci at lists.debian.org
> User: debian-ci at lists.debian.org
> Usertags: breaks needs-update
> 
> Dear maintainer(s),
> 
> With a recent upload of glibc the autopkgtest of node-iconv fails in
> testing on all architectures when that autopkgtest is run with the
> binary packages of glibc from unstable. It passes when run with only
> packages from testing. In tabular form:
> 
>                        pass            fail
> glibc                  from testing    2.31-5
> node-iconv             from testing    2.3.5-4
> all others             from testing    from testing
> 
> I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.
> 
> Currently this regression is blocking the migration of glibc to testing
> [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against
> both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the
> bug to the right package?
> 
> More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
> https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
> 
> Paul
Hi,

I rebuild node-iconv (nocheck) and rebuild/autopkgtest reverse
dependencies of node-iconv, all passed:
 * rebuild: node-body-parser, node-encoding, node-expat,
            node-iconv-lite, node-raw-body
 * autopkgtest: node-body-parser, node-d3-dsv, node-raw-body

So maybe we can just ignore 2 failing tests for now (a "should throw"
which doesn't throw).

NB: I tried also with node-iconv 3.0.0, same problem in test.



More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list