[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#934141: Bug#934141: jsbeautifier and node-js-beautify should use alternatives

[Xavier]

Le 07/08/2019 à 19:13, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 07/08/2019 à 14:56, Xavier Guimard a écrit :
>> Package: jsbeautifier
>> Version: 1.6.4-7
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> both jsbeautifier and node-js-beautify come from the same upstream
>> source, the first provides js-beautify and the second html-beautify and
>> css-beautify. This crazy situation should be solved by an "alternative" to
>> provides the 3 scripts.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Xavier
> 
> This situation follows https://bugs.debian.org/888903 in which it was
> decided to keep /usr/bin/js-beautify in jsbeautifier (previously
> packaged) even if node-js-beautify provided /usr/bin/html-beautify and
> /usr/bin/css-beautify.
> 
> Upstream source provides both Python and JavaScript code to build these
> binaries, same name, same algorithm, same options but different languages.

I'm expanding this thread to for lack of response