[Pkg-javascript-devel] gulp 4 migration

[Paolo Greppi]

Il 13/01/20 07:10, Pirate Praveen ha scritto:
> ...
> Nopes. FTBFS is rc and people do periodic archive wide rebuilds and this can get packages removed from testing. I prefer we fix at least important packages before pushing gulp 4 to unstable.
> 
> gulp package is not an end in itself, but the whole reason gulp was packaged was to build these packages as its unlikely any end user will want to use packaged gulp.
> 
> For packages that is likely to be used directly by users, your approach is OK.

Thanks Pravi, I agree.

What is the best oneliner to test a package targeting unstable with a mix of selected packages from experimental ?

Preferably using https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta ...
And what about telling salsa CI to do so for us ?

?