[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-katex_0.10.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Scott Kitterman]

On Thursday, June 18, 2020 4:57:52 PM EDT Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2020, ജൂൺ 19 1:40:09 AM IST, Bastian Blank <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
> >The introduces an unnecessary split into katex and libjs-katex.
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54
> 
> * User-facing executable programs associated with a library should usually
> be packaged in a non-library binary package whose name reflects the program
> (for example tappy, flatpak, parted) or collection of related programs (for
> example kmod, libsecret-tools, libglib2.0-bin), rather than being bundled
> in the same binary package as the runtime library.
> 
> Do you disagree with recommendation of ctte or you don't think it does not
> apply here?

You did read the rest of that, right?

Scott K
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20200618/06ec2525/attachment-0001.sig>