[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-fn.name vs node-fn-name

Andrius Merkys merkys at debian.org
Thu Nov 5 10:14:29 GMT 2020


Hello,

On 2020-11-05 11:37, Paul Wise wrote:
> Based solely on the usage information in the README, their APIs are
> compatible, so just changing from fn.name to fn-name or vice versa in
> the require() call will be enough to switch between them.

Thanks, I will try it.

> I'm not sure which one is better, but fn-name started earlier and has
> more recent commits than fn.name.

I too would say that fn-name should be kept and fn.name should be removed.

> I noticed that neither fn-name nor fn-name have any reverse
> dependencies in Debian so perhaps they should just both be removed?

node-assume, which is yet to be uploaded, depends on fn.name. Once I get
to the autopkgtest, I will try drop-in replacing fn.name with fn-name.

> I also noticed that fn-name is outdated in Debian compared to upstream.

Indeed. I will give it a look.

Best,
Andrius



More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list