[Pkg-javascript-devel] Work needed

[Xavier]

Le 10/10/2020 à 13:35, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
> 
> 
> Le sam. 10 oct. 2020 à 10:52, Xavier <yadd at debian.org
> <mailto:yadd at debian.org>> a écrit :
> 
>     Le 27/08/2020 à 12:39, Xavier a écrit :
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > to prepare bullseye release, we have (at least) to fix:
>     >  * node-request* removal (replacement by node-got, node-axios,...),
>     >    needs to fix:
>     >    - less.js
>     >    - node-coveralls
>     >    - node-gyp
>     >    - node-jsdom
>     >    - node-jsonld
>     >    - node-matrix-js-sdk
>     >    - node-millstone
>     >    - node-telegram-bot-api
>     >    - node-yarnpkg
>     >  * node-cross-spawn removal, only node-execa needs a fix (see
>     #959786).
>     >    Embedding cross-spawn in node-execa could be a solution since
>     >    vulnerable features seem not used in it
>     >  * eyes.js: needs a vows update (not released by upstream) #961507
>     >  * node-xterm: problem with @types/jsdom
>     >  * nodejs: ppc64el regression #968681
>     >  * libjs-jquery-hotkeys: jquery.hotkeys changes break python-coverage
>     >                          html reports (#740893)
>     >
>     > Updating node-jest (not usable for now, migration blocked) should be a
>     > good thing but this requires at least node-jsdom fixes.
>     >
>     > Feel free to update this list of course.
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     I need some help:
>      * gyp should be given to Python Team and fixed (#963320)
> 
> 
> I'll look into fixing it and moving it to Python Team.
> 
>  
> 
>      * node-execa/node-cross-spawn: need analysis to see if cross-spawn can
>        be safely embedded
> 
> 
> Can you push upstream tags, please ?

Done, thanks!