[Pkg-javascript-devel] Update node-vue-style-loader package

[Pirate Praveen]

2022, ഏപ്രിൽ 3 2:22:00 PM IST, Michael Ikwuegbu <michaelikwuegbu1 at gmail.com>ൽ എഴുതി
>Gooday,
>I have made the required changes to the package. Thank you for the valuable
>insight.
>My salsa repo: https://salsa.debian.org/mikemando/node-vue-style-loader

Uploaded, thanks for your contribution.

>On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 13:14, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas at jones.dk> wrote:
>
>> Quoting Pirate Praveen (2022-04-01 13:18:11)
>> >
>> >
>> > On വ്യാ, മാർ 31 2022 at 11:22:22 രാവിലെ +0100
>> > +0100, Michael Ikwuegbu <michaelikwuegbu1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >  I have updated the package node-vue-style-loader from version
>> > > (4.1.2 —> 4.1.3).
>> > >
>> > >  I am requesting for sponsorship. I have made sure the package is
>> > > Lintian clean and built it in a clean chroot with sbuild.
>> > >  I have pushed the current changes to my salsa repository:
>> > > https://salsa.debian.org/mikemando/node-vue-style-loader
>> > >
>> > > The package is available at:
>> > > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-vue-style-loader
>> > >
>> >
>> > We should follow the years mentioned in license files
>> >
>> >
>> https://salsa.debian.org/mikemando/node-vue-style-loader/-/commit/4384975bd7f875a4312104d61ae0f885664f3602
>> >
>> > We don't need to update year if upstream has not updated it. So just
>> > keep it 2017 or if you really wanted, you could say 2017-2022. Year in
>> > copyright indicates the time when it was created or modified.
>> >
>> > For files in debian directry we may update it, but not really
>> > required. If at all you wanted to update, you can add your name for
>> > 2022 and keep the previous line the same.
>>
>> I agree with the final suggestion, but feel that the previous remarks are
>> misleading:
>>
>> Copyright notices are messages from the copyright holders to users, and
>> we should only communicate that message, not alter it!
>>
>> When you write or update the debian/copyright file, then you act as
>> "secretary" for the owners of the project - only for files in the
>> debian/ directory that you created or changed yourself should you decide
>> on your own which years are correct. For all other notices (also those
>> of fellow Debian maintainers) you should only update to mirror facts
>> already stated elsewhere in the project.
>>
>> If you feel the need to extend or correct some statements, then add a
>> Comment: field describing how/why your information is different - e.g.
>> "No license was stated in the project, but is assumed to be the same as
>> https://example.com/foobar that is licensed as blabla-2.0".
>>
>>
>> Please also note that copyright years reflect when [original] change is
>> introduced (i.e. time of innovation, not time of every change, and not
>> time of release).
>>
>> [original]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright#Originality
>>
>> Generally the copyright holder decides which changes should be
>> considered "original".  Because nowadays copyright [registration] is
>> automatic and main purpose of copyright [notices] have shifted to be a
>> reminder to users that "I made something here, so if you want to
>> negotiate licensing you should get in touch with me".
>>
>> [registration]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright#Registration
>>
>> [notices]:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_notice#Reasons_to_include_an_optional_copyright_notice
>>
>>
>>  - Jonas
>>
>> --
>>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>>
>>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
>
>
>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.