[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1003039: Bug#1003039: Bug#1003039: node-terser: Please update node-commander dependency to version 8

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Quoting Yadd (2022-02-06 17:02:08)
> On 06/02/2022 17:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Yadd (2022-02-06 13:18:10)
> >> On 06/02/2022 12:35, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >>> Quoting Yadd (2022-01-03 08:08:31)
> >>>> node-commander 8 changed option parsing. Here is a proposed patch 
> >>>> to be used in replacement of 1001_use_commander_4.patch
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the patch!
> >>>
> >>> If I understand correctly, the patch is not backwards-compatible 
> >>> with node-commander currently in Debian unstable/testing.  I will 
> >>> therefore do nothing until node-commander enters unstable.
> > 
> >> Thanks to look at this. Yes, we have to coordinate this because I 
> >> have to add a 'Breaks: node-terser (<< XXX)'
> > 
> > Could you please clarify: Which range of node-commander releases 
> > should the proposed patch support?
> 
> AFAIK, it is for commander >= 7

Thanks for clarifying - much appreciated.

For future sake, the long description indented lines in DEP-3 patch 
header is an excellent place to mention such details about the scope of 
the patch - and it is less helpful to write "same patch than uglifyjs" 
there, because such note require external knowledge: uglifyjs module? 
uglifyjs rpm package? which version? same how?

I.e. DEP-3 headers should be equally sensible to other distros and to 
upstream - notes specific to a distro should explicitly state that (e.g. 
using Bug-Debian: hint).

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20220206/0a3c4d36/attachment.sig>