[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1103133: Bug#1103133: simulate-event.js: FTBFS in testing/i386: make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 2
Jérémy Lal
kapouer at melix.org
Thu Apr 17 08:27:00 BST 2025
Le jeu. 17 avr. 2025 à 09:03, Paul Gevers <elbrus at debian.org> a écrit :
> Control: reassign -1 node-browserify
> Control: affects -1 src:simulate-event.js
> Control: retitle -1 browserify segfaults building i386/simulate-event.js
>
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:41:39 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum <lucas at debian.org>
> wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
> > to build on i386.
>
>
> src:simulate-event.js only builds arch:all binaries, so this case is
> normally not detected. I very much looks like the toolchain segfaults,
> which I don't think we should blame on this source.
>
> > Relevant part (hopefully):
> > > debian/rules binary
> > > dh binary
> > > dh_update_autotools_config
> > > dh_autoreconf
> > > dh_auto_configure --buildsystem=nodejs
> > > Link ./node_modules/xtend -> /usr/share/nodejs/xtend
> > > debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
> > > make[1]: Entering directory
> '/build/reproducible-path/simulate-event.js-1.4.0'
> > > browserify simulate-event.js -o dist/simulate-event.js
> > > make[1]: *** [debian/rules:11: override_dh_auto_build] Segmentation
> fault
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory
> '/build/reproducible-path/simulate-event.js-1.4.0'
> > > make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 2
>
>
> It *appears* to me that it's browserify that fails, but as I don't know
> the ecosystem well, it could be something below that. Reassigning for
> further inspection.
>
The segmentation faults are "probably" (because I didn't check this one)
all the same bug on i386:
https://bugs.debian.org/1076350
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20250417/d04dd9e2/attachment.htm>
More information about the Pkg-javascript-devel
mailing list