[Pkg-javascript-devel] RM node-bunyan, node-schlock ?

[Jonas Smedegaard]

[sent again, properly to the list this time]

Quoting Jérémy Lal (2025-01-10 15:02:57)
> These are old packages, inactive upstream, without reverse (build-)deps.
> node-schlock build-depends on node-bunyan.
> 
> There are probably a lot more packages like this.

Should everyone in the team share their opinion, as a form of vote?

Or should perhaps those bothering to respond within within some window
of time decide?

I believe that I have in the past proposed that we adopt the same logic
as I've seen in the multimedia team: Use the Uploaders field to indicate
team members devoted to a package, and ask those to decide on questions
like the above - and consider a package with fewer than 2 devotees as
poorly maintained, and thus in need of more attention or removal.

If you feel that I am hijacking your nore narrow topic, then just ignore
it - I have no opinion particularly on the two packages you mention.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
 * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 931 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/attachments/20250110/fea5817f/attachment.sig>