[Pkg-julia-devel] julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Graham Inggs]

Hi Bastian

My apologies in advance for doing this, but another month has passed.
Another ping from me.

On 2018/10/25 12:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
>> Lumin writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
>>> 1. Isn't "incomplete backtrace" a sensible reason to keep debug symbols?
>>>     Policy said "should" but not "must". Please tell me what I can do in
>>>     order to help improve the src:julia package to satisfy the requirements?
>>
>> My main concern here is this: AFAICT this package has been REJECTed
>> solely for this reason.  Why is this bug[1] a reason for a REJECT ?
>> ISTM that it should be filed in the BTS and handled like a normal bug.
> 
> Ping, ftpmaster ?
> 
> Ian.
> 
>> [1] Assuming it is a bug.  The discussion here suggests to me that it
>> is, but it is really unhelpful to be having it on debian-devel in the
>> context of an ftpmaster REJECTion.
> 

 From the original REJECTion email from mid-August [1], there were two 
issues, but I believe both have been explained in the follow-up emails 
and subsequent uploads.

Regards
Graham


[1] 
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-julia-devel/Week-of-Mon-20180813/001840.html