[Pkg-kbd-devel] Why console-setup is not migrating to testing
Frans Pop
elendil at planet.nl
Wed Oct 18 13:47:55 UTC 2006
Hi all,
q-funk asked today on IRC if console-setup could be hinted into testing.
The answer is: no, or at least not without some discussion first.
IIUC console-setup is intended as an eventual replacement for
console-common and console-data, and possibly also for kbd-chooser in
Debian Installer.
It is currently blocked for migration because it has udebs, and I have
never let it be hinted for migration because I have no idea what those
udebs are, what they do and how they are supposed to be used in the
installer.
I can remember no discussion on either debian-boot or debian-devel about
the actual implementation of console-setup in the installer, or even
about a migration to console-setup for installed systems.
IMHO such a discussion should happen first (as the existing console-common
is a core package), before console-setup migrates to testing.
In any case, for the installer it is now too late to make a switch to
console-setup for Etch, and I'd prefer not to have two unused and
untested udebs in Etch.
So, if you'd like to see console-setup in Etch, I would suggest the
correct steps are:
- convince the project and RMs that having it in Etch would be a good
idea;
- disable the building of udebs and upload a new version without udebs.
Of course, I would be happy to see a mail on the debian-boot list
explaining how we could switch to console-setup post-Etch and work with
you to implement that. That's also why I suggest to disable the building
of the udebs and not to remove it completely.
Cheers,
FJP
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kbd-devel/attachments/20061018/168c4d03/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-kbd-devel
mailing list