Bug#379585: Bug#379441: [Pkg-kde-extras] how to continue: digikam 0.9-beta1 in unstable instead of experimental

[Mark Purcell]

> Le mer 26 juillet 2006 12:17, Mark Purcell a écrit :
[...]
> you will need an epoch, because people will have the 0.9 version
> installed. your fight is over, you lost already. let it go, shit
> happens, epoch is indeed designed for such situations.
>
> so it's your epoch-able problem number 1, too bad ;)

Thanks Pierre,

I think you are right, an epoc won't hurt us... :-)

Despite the suggestion from Adeodato I think we should just go with:

1:0.8.2-1 into unstable, and
1:0.9-beta1-1 into experimental
1:0.9-beta1-2
1:0.9-beta2-1

Which can then grow into:
1:0.9-rc1-1
1:0.9-rc1-2
1:0.9-rc2-1
...

and
1:0.9.0-1 when we getto final upstream

Mark