[Pkg-kde-talk] license problems ...

[Matías Costa]

El Lunes 07 Marzo 2005 20:18, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
> El Lunes, 7 de Marzo de 2005 18:59, Matías Costa escribió:
> > > So if we can not propose any alternative license (for documentation),=
 I
>
>                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> > > don't know what can be done. :-(
> >
> > The most valuable part in KDE, the code, is LGPL. Then, why not suggest
> > make the doc LGPL too?
>
> IMHO, because it's not a license designed for documentation.

From the faq:

Q: I'm writing documentation to accompany a free program. What license should 
I use for this documentation? 
A: We strongly suggest you use the same license as used for the program. Then 
it will be possible to take code and put it into the documentation, and vice 
versa.

I know a faq is not a law, but seems all doc-licenses are not DFSG friendly. I 
thought the CC but looks like this one neither is good for debian. ¿May be 
dual licensing FDL/LGPL?