meta-kde4 and meta-kde (final conclusions)

Wed Apr 22 16:28:48 UTC 2009

On Mié 22 Abr 2009 13:07:02 Ana Guerrero escribió:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 06:49:33AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > We should kill meta-kde and update meta-kde4 to some final layout.
>
> ...
>
> After leaving this issue "sleep" a couple of weeks, I am all for:
>
> kde-full (current kde4)
> kde-minimal
> kde-thirdparty
>
> And we can keep using kde-$MEANING for the metapackages.

+1

> Since we have to go to NEW i will add already kde-thirdparty with
> RECOMMENDS in amarok, ktorrent, yakuake, rsibreak anything else?

¿konversation maybe?

> Another question: kde-full should provide "kde" ?

IMHO, the metapackage kde should not exist.

> We really need to move forward with the metapackages before people get very
> used to current ones...

I do also agree here.

Reagrds, Lisandro.

-- 
http://mx.grulic.org.ar/lurker/message/20081108.174208.4f42e55c.es.html
Así se corrobora el software legal en Argentina

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20090422/a4c2606d/attachment.pgp>