get akonadiconsole out of kdepim-runtime
Modestas Vainius
modestas at vainius.eu
Wed Jul 22 21:32:27 UTC 2009
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 23 Liepa 2009 00:00:41 Harald Sitter wrote:
> The options to get it out of there:
> 1) In Kubuntu the package is split into -runtime, -runtime-data and
> -runtime-dev, so eventually Debian should adopt that and move
> akondiconsole to the -dev package
We will not split off -data as long as it basically contains *.desktop files
and is around ~40 kb in size (multiarch is still not here). *-runtime-dev does
not make sense by definition.
> 2) Split akonadiconsole into its own package
Maybe we could ask upstream to move it to back kdepim(libs)? Debugging tools
do not really belong to -runtime packages, do they? In my opinion, if to split
off akonadiconsole, then invent another package name like kdepim-runtime-dev-
tools (similar to qt4-dev-tools) or something.
> 3) Split only the akonadiconsole binary in its own package and patch
> the desktop file to use TryExec
Why would we need to patch desktop file? We typically ship desktop file in the
same package as the binary to avoid dangling desktop files.
> I personally prefer option 2 since -dev should only contain binaries
> that are actually needed for building software (e.g. what can be found
> in kdelibs5-dev).
Yeah, *-runtime-dev name would be confusing. However, I don't think
akonadiconsole is so important to get a package of its own. A package where
all such devel tools could be put (in the future) is more appropriate.
--
Modestas Vainius <modestas at vainius.eu>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20090723/976acfc1/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pkg-kde-talk
mailing list