testing migration errors about libqt4-webkit

Daniel Pocock daniel at pocock.pro
Mon Sep 14 17:11:11 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 14/09/15 19:05, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-09-14 17:54, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 14/09/15 17:34, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>>> On Monday 14 September 2015 10:12:40 Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>> https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=postbooks
>>>> tells me that my package didn't migrate to testing because
>>>> "libqt4-webkit is not available in Debian"
>>>> 
>>>> I unpacked the binary package[1] with "dpkg -e ..." and
>>>> looking inside the control file, libqt4-webkit is not
>>>> mentioned anywhere.  It only depends on libqtwebkit4 (>=
>>>> 2.1.0~2011week13)
>>>> 
>>>> The source package has a build dependency on libqtwebkit-dev
>>>> 
>>>> Furthermore, the update_excuses page[2] doesn't mention
>>>> libqt-webkit4 at all.
>>>> 
>>>> Is there some special logic around the migration of qtwebkit
>>>> reverse dependencies now?  Or is there some bug in the
>>>> migration process?
>>> 
>>> Nothing strange on our side, I would ask the Release Team about
>>> this :-/
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Can anybody in the release team comment on this?
>> 
>> [...]
> 
> I have no clue why testing.pl concludes that postbooks depends on 
> libqt4-webkit.  However, that is a red herring. Sadly, it is not
> the most reliable/accurate service.
> 

Ok, thanks for confirming that, is there anywhere I should report this
issue as a bug?  The page itself only has Björn's email address.

> The issue is that migrating postbooks would make postbooks-updater 
> uninstallable on amd64.  I have tried to add an easy hint to make 
> Britney migrate postbooks together with postbooks-updater (without 
> having checked if it will work).

They were all built together and I even ran them on my production
database, so I'm hoping they are working together

When I update these packages in future, do I need to contact the
release team to add a hint or is there anything I can do to streamline
this process?

> If it does not migrate tonight, we will revisit it.  Please note
> that the migration mails are set only once a day (next in 22 hours
> from now), so please use dak or rmadision if you want to know
> before then.
> 
> Thanks, ~Niels
> 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=iuI5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the pkg-kde-talk mailing list