testing migration errors about libqt4-webkit
Daniel Pocock
daniel at pocock.pro
Mon Sep 14 17:11:11 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 14/09/15 19:05, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-09-14 17:54, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14/09/15 17:34, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>>> On Monday 14 September 2015 10:12:40 Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>> https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=postbooks
>>>> tells me that my package didn't migrate to testing because
>>>> "libqt4-webkit is not available in Debian"
>>>>
>>>> I unpacked the binary package[1] with "dpkg -e ..." and
>>>> looking inside the control file, libqt4-webkit is not
>>>> mentioned anywhere. It only depends on libqtwebkit4 (>=
>>>> 2.1.0~2011week13)
>>>>
>>>> The source package has a build dependency on libqtwebkit-dev
>>>>
>>>> Furthermore, the update_excuses page[2] doesn't mention
>>>> libqt-webkit4 at all.
>>>>
>>>> Is there some special logic around the migration of qtwebkit
>>>> reverse dependencies now? Or is there some bug in the
>>>> migration process?
>>>
>>> Nothing strange on our side, I would ask the Release Team about
>>> this :-/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Can anybody in the release team comment on this?
>>
>> [...]
>
> I have no clue why testing.pl concludes that postbooks depends on
> libqt4-webkit. However, that is a red herring. Sadly, it is not
> the most reliable/accurate service.
>
Ok, thanks for confirming that, is there anywhere I should report this
issue as a bug? The page itself only has Björn's email address.
> The issue is that migrating postbooks would make postbooks-updater
> uninstallable on amd64. I have tried to add an easy hint to make
> Britney migrate postbooks together with postbooks-updater (without
> having checked if it will work).
They were all built together and I even ran them on my production
database, so I'm hoping they are working together
When I update these packages in future, do I need to contact the
release team to add a hint or is there anything I can do to streamline
this process?
> If it does not migrate tonight, we will revisit it. Please note
> that the migration mails are set only once a day (next in 22 hours
> from now), so please use dak or rmadision if you want to know
> before then.
>
> Thanks, ~Niels
>
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=iuI5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the pkg-kde-talk
mailing list