kdepim 17.08.3 and kde-l10n

Sandro Knauß hefee at debian.org
Sat Dec 23 14:02:49 UTC 2017


Hey,

now most of kdepim 17.08.3 was successfully built now.
But now I triggered a bug of dak and now part of kdepim will need to through NEW again. 
If you have any good ideas or anything how we can fix that form out side... Otherwise
kdepim will be broken in sid till ftp-masters have the time to accept them...

hefee

#debian-ftp:

[14:28] <hefee> Hey,
[14:29] <hefee> kf5-messagelib got into NEW queue and I do not understand why, because it was accepted before for experiemtal
[14:30] <hefee> and now with the new upload to unstable ( higher version number 4:17.08.0-1 -> 4:17.08.3-1) buildds sent the package another time to NEW queue
[14:31] <hefee> btw same happend for pim-sieve-editor
[14:31] <hefee> it would be really nice, if the kdepim can finally migrate to unstable
[14:32] <hefee> me is also very interessted, why this new round through NEW was triggered
[14:33] <hefee> if I can help you in any way, please tell me
[14:35] <ansgar> 20171222015508|check-overrides|dak|removing unused override|unstable|main|deb|libkf5mimetreeparser-dev|optional|libdevel|None
[14:36] <ansgar> The source package was uploaded a bit earlier to unstable: 2017-12-21 17:33
[14:37] <ansgar> Then experimental packages gets removed.  Then overrides for the binary package are unused.
[14:37] <ansgar> A bit later the buildd uploads arrive (2017-12-22 04:18), but the override is gone -> binary new.
[14:40] <carnil> ansgar: could you process src:linux from NEW on security-master?
[14:40] <carnil> bwh: ^^
[14:42] <carnil> (or any other ftp-master, because we need it quite urgently)
[14:47] <ansgar> carnil: Almost done.
[14:47] <carnil> ansgar: thank you
[14:48] <hefee> ansgar: so the built process took to long and the overrides were already removed?
[14:49] <ansgar> hefee: Yes.  It looks like dak should be less agressive removing overrides (or know which source package the overrides belong to and only remove them if the source is gone).
[14:50] <hefee> ansgar: can this be fixed easily?
[14:51] <hefee> i mean to make the dak less aggressive is not easily fixable :D
[14:51] <hefee> i mean for my two packages and maybe more?
[14:51] <jcristau> wat
[14:51] <jcristau> your two packages are not special
[14:52] <jcristau> there's no reason to special case them, they'll be processed eventually
[14:54] <hefee> *sigh* they were already accepted and now the whole prcoess of preparing the new upload in experimental is broken
[14:55] <jcristau> *shrug*
[14:55] <hefee> btw. than also more packages will be need to be reaccepted: pim-sieve-editor,kf5-messagelib,kaddressbook,libkf5mailcommon,blogilo,akonadi-calendar-tools,grantlee-editor,akregator,libkf5eventviews,akonadiconsole,akonadi-import-wizard,kmail,kalarm,mbox-importer,pim-data-exporter,libkf5incidenceeditor,kdepim-addons,korganizer
[14:56] <hefee> this are all packages that need kf5-messagelib as build-dep
[14:56] <jcristau> why would they need reaccept?
[14:57] <hefee> because they were all uploaded at the same time with kf5-messagelib and are waiting for built the same time, so i think the overrides are removed too
[14:58] * hefee okay to be presice i havn't check in detail what packages exactly were new with 17.08.1-1
[14:59] * hefee but for sure there will more go through NEW again, because with 17.08.0 kdepim was splitted in serveral source packages


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20171223/14323c73/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-kde-talk mailing list