Removing amarok
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
perezmeyer at gmail.com
Tue Dec 26 00:57:00 UTC 2017
El lunes, 11 de septiembre de 2017 10:35:54 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
escribió:
> Hi everybody! I'm considering asking for the RoM removal of amarok
> from the archive. It has plenty of bugs, no active upstream (aka dead
> upstream) and no finished port to Qt5.
>
> With a package in this state I would normally just go ahead and ask
> the removal, but I know lots of people love amarok...
>
> My suggestion for them would be to get it from stable until they find
> a suitable replacement. But the truth is that it currently does not
> belongs in Buster and there is no signal of having a chance to avoid
> it.
>
> Does anyone has anything against this?
OK, I think now it's the right time to go ahead with this. Does anyone knows a good reason not
to do it now?
Cheers, Lisandro.
--
Cuando me preguntaron sobre algún arma capaz de contrarrestar el poder de la
bomba atómica, yo sugerí la mejor de todas: la paz.
Albert Einstein
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20171225/ee5b06a2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20171225/ee5b06a2/attachment.sig>
More information about the pkg-kde-talk
mailing list