Do we know the last binutils version it used to work?

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

On domingo, 8 de enero de 2017 23:40:00 ART Matthias Klose wrote:
> The
> binutils update plan was announced last June [1], and I plan to stick to
> it.
> 
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/06/msg00007.html

The binutils update plan says:

  Expecting binutils 2.27 (or maybe binutils 2.28) for stretch. binutils 2.27
  will be uploaded to unstable after the GCC defaults change.

We had binutils 2.27 which did not cause the issue and no technical reason why 
we *need* 2.28. Would you mind stating it?

-- 
Combata las características. Si una característica no es absolutamente
esencial, descártela, especialmente si tiene el mismo efecto que se
puede alcanzar mediante la combinación de otras características.
  Andrew S. Tanenbaum, de su libro "Computer Networks"

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20170109/35d186f3/attachment-0001.sig>