Should we remove amarok?

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

Hi! Amarok is currently unbuildable on unstable because of a missing 
dependency (#877295) and soon it will be a double issue trough #896941.

I know that there is an upstream effort to provide a Qt5-based amarok, but 
does that means we should keep it unbuildable in unstable?

I would simply prefer to remove it, but maybe I am missing something here. So, 
if you have any thoughts on why we should not remove it, please do say so.

Cheers!

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20180517/c4a61ee0/attachment.sig>