Should we remove amarok?

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

On 17 May 2018 at 12:07, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
<perezmeyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> El jueves, 17 de mayo de 2018 11:59:12 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> escribió:
>> Hi! Amarok is currently unbuildable on unstable because of a missing
>> dependency (#877295) and soon it will be a double issue trough #896941.
>>
>> I know that there is an upstream effort to provide a Qt5-based amarok, but
>> does that means we should keep it unbuildable in unstable?
>>
>> I would simply prefer to remove it, but maybe I am missing something here.
>> So, if you have any thoughts on why we should not remove it, please do say
>> so.

I have just communicated with Pino. He told me that he is interested
in keeping amarok
in shape but due different reasons he was not able to do it yet. I
proposed him to handle
it myself if I get to it first.

Both bugs seems to be solvable by removing deps +/- touching some
files if needed.

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/