Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

[Soren Stoutner]

Seeing as how .bdic files are not exclusive to Qt, qt-convert-dict is probably 
not the most accurate name, but bdic-convert-dict would make sense.  Another 
option would be to name it convert-bdic.  The Chromium upstream names the tool 
convert_dict, but we aren’t beholden to follow their lead.

I have updated the merge request to name the tool /usr/bin/convert-bdic,  and 
the virtual package to be convert-bdic, but can change it again if there is a 
consensus in a different direction.

On Saturday, February 4, 2023 10:51:38 AM MST Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry for my absence, and sorry if it's already discussed:
> 
> Why convert-dict? Sounds to generic to me, can't we at least do
> qt-convert-dict or bdic-convert-dict or so?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Rene


-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren at stoutner.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20230204/dd2cbce6/attachment-0001.sig>