DEP-14 discussion and our packaging workflow

[Steven Robbins]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2024 2:53:32 P.M. CDT Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
> So before chiming in I'm interesting in gathering some opinions from you,
> regular and occasional contributors.

I guess I'm not your target audience, as I'm not a Qt/KDE contributor; I just 
hang out here to get help with digikam packaging.

> How much do you value the debian-only workflow ? Would you be willing to
> switch to a workflow where we need to maintain commits / branches / tags
> representing upstream source for Qt and KDE packages ?

I've only ever followed the Debian Science / Debian Med policy that includes 
upstream source.  When I did try to build from a debian-only repo, I found the 
workflow awkward.  I don't see the value in that.

-Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20240821/597d424f/attachment.sig>