Try to package for glaxnimate

[Hefee]

Hey,
 
> I did some initial work for packaging glaxnimate(see repo:
> https://salsa.debian.org/ybx332/glaxnimate).

thanks for starting packaging it!

> But now I'm facing a problem. According to Debian policy, package
> needs to be linked to system library instead of their own bundled
> version.
>
> This package includes two packages, one QtColorWidgets and another
> called QtAppSetup. The first one is already in the repo.
> 
> But for the second one, if we want to package it, what name should we
> use? Should we use original name or simply change the package name?

For the repo name we normally just use the upstream name, if that is not too 
curious :) The important for us in Debian are the binary package name, but 
there you should have a lot examples and our team website (https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/) with some rules for the naming schema. In case just 
ask more concrete questions about specific package names.

Just a side note: Actually if you start packaging you normally create a ITP 
(intent to package) bug against wnpp package to signal the Debian community 
that you are preparing something. In the case of glaxnate there exists a RFP ( 
request for packaging) #1071646, so you should sent an update to this bug 
report, that you started packaging it.

> And just in curiosity, is pkg-kde-talk abandoned? 

This list still exists and is functioning, but as we are all volunteers, 
things fall down and no one replies. I would recommend you to join the irc 
channel #debian-qt-kde, there you normally get faster replies.

Best regards,

hefee

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20260906/0831c3a5/attachment.sig>