[Pkg-libburnia-devel] why is libisoburn not uploaded yet ?
danchev at spnet.net
Sat Apr 26 07:19:56 UTC 2008
On Friday 25 April 2008, Mario Danic wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 19:00 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > Hello libburnians,
> Hey George,
> > I'd like to ask why is libisoburn source package not uploaded yet ?
> We will upload once we (upstream) release next version of
> > It isn't
> > finished yet or it just has been waiting for something (I'm not aware of)
> > to happen first. Another sub-question is why is xorriso binary package
> > produced by that libisoburn source one, when we have a separate upstream
> > tarball for it. I personally see no gain in combining these, since they
> > might easily have asynchronous releases, but if you insist I'm fine.
> Ignore that separate tarball, it is of no use to distributions as it is
> rather a development build based on unreleased libisofs and libisoburn.
Ah, I now remeber that.
> > Also (in case of latter)
> > it would be a nice to have a get-orig-source target in debian/rules which
> > can help the construction (fetching included) of such a combined
> > "upstream" orig.gz tarball to ease the life other builders. What do you
> > feel about these ?
> Read above.
> Any more questions? :)
Not for now. Thanks for your replies!
P.S. We might visit Zagreb dirung these holidays ;-)
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
More information about the Pkg-libburnia-devel