[Pkg-libburnia-devel] Consistent version naming.
George Danchev
danchev at spnet.net
Sat Jun 11 05:39:45 UTC 2011
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 12:08:17 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
Morning,
> Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> > > I recall
> > > a thread at the upstream mailing list mentioning these patch
> > > levels, but the discussion seems to have ended inconclusively.
>
> George Danchev:
> > I think that the 'pl' (patch level) suffixes will be dropped with the
> > next upstream releases.
>
> That's the plan, yes.
> The decision was made around 12 May 2011 on libburn-hackers list:
Great.
> me:
> >>>> I am willing to drop those suffixes.
> >>>> But won't that impose extra work or pitfalls on the distro package
> >>>> maintainers ?
>
> George Danchev:
> >>> I'm quite sure that any package manager will treat, say:
> >>> 1.0.8 as greater than 1.0.6.pl00.
>
> So i will change the scheme and then listen for protests.
I don't expect protests with sound reasoning behind.
Wrt, to patch-levels, I guess it is absolutely fine to release 1.0.8.[0-9] when
some targetted and minimal fix needs to be applied, i.e. digits without pl.
> BTW:
> Are there any test results which would prevent release of
> libburn-1.0.8.tar.gz ?
None, I'm aware of.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
More information about the Pkg-libburnia-devel
mailing list