[Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#626092: marked as done (Should depend on libgtk-vnc-2.0-0 instead of libgtk-vnc-1.0-0)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:44:53 +0200
with message-id <87y60kh3yy.fsf at gismo.pca.it>
and subject line Re: Bug#626092: Should depend on libgtk-vnc-2.0-0 instead of libgtk-vnc-1.0-0
has caused the Debian Bug report #626092,
regarding Should depend on libgtk-vnc-2.0-0 instead of libgtk-vnc-1.0-0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
626092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626092
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd at debian.org>
Subject: Should depend on libgtk-vnc-2.0-0 instead of libgtk-vnc-1.0-0
Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 19:42:20 +0100
Size: 3086
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-libvirt-maintainers/attachments/20110629/d4f4fabf/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Luca Capello <luca at pca.it>
Subject: Re: Bug#626092: Should depend on libgtk-vnc-2.0-0 instead of libgtk-vnc-1.0-0
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:44:53 +0200
Size: 4047
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-libvirt-maintainers/attachments/20110629/d4f4fabf/attachment-0001.mht>