[Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] (no subject)

[Christian Hofstaedtler]

Guido,

* Guido Günther <agx at sigxcpu.org> [131223 11:44]:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:53:12PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > Strictly speaking only a binNMU would be required, but these patches 
> > should make that a bit nicer.
> 
> Just out of curiosity: wouldn't it be nicer to ship the ruby1.9 and 2.0
> gems in different packages or is it common to ship all of those in one
> package?

We had this before, with lib${package}-ruby1.8 and -ruby1.9.1. This
turned Ruby version transitions a lot of manual work.
With all versions combined into a single package (and legacy
packages gone), we hope that binNMUs will be sufficient for most
packages.

Cheers,
    Christian

-- 
 ,''`.  Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha at debian.org>
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C  D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03
  `-

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-libvirt-maintainers/attachments/20131223/23a27e3c/attachment.sig>