[Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#783106: lxc container does not start automatically

Guido Günther agx at sigxcpu.org
Fri May 1 17:50:02 UTC 2015


On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 07:08:13PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 04/30/15 08:50, Guido Günther wrote:
> > * lxc is lacking error reporting
> 
> if you start it via initscript and have no error-logging, then indeed
> you don't see any error.
> 
> > * doesn't wait for libvirt to come up - it's debatable wether this would
> >   be a good thing
> 
> no; both the initscript and the systemd unit have network as a depends -
> there's nothing more we can do on the lxc (or any other service that
> requires network to be up) side.
> 
> > I would totally agree that libvirt has a bug if the lxc container would
> > be libvirt managed (via lxc://) but this isn't the case.
> 
> right; but the user is abusing libvirt here to setup his bridge, rather
> than to configure it normally. it's up to you though if you want to
> 'allow' users to use libvirt like that or not.

We we won't lose anything if we add a "Should-Start: libvirtd", do we?
Cheers,
 -- Guido



More information about the Pkg-libvirt-maintainers mailing list