[Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] Bug#844511: marked as done (should libvirt be FTBFS at the moment due to the new gnutls?)

Wed Dec 7 16:21:06 UTC 2016

Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:19:07 +0000
with message-id <E1cEevz-000EDr-EF at fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#844511: fixed in libvirt 2.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #844511,
regarding should libvirt be FTBFS at the moment due to the new gnutls?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

-- 
844511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com>
Subject: should libvirt be FTBFS at the moment due to the new gnutls?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:05:31 +0100
Size: 6673
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-libvirt-maintainers/attachments/20161207/123056be/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: =?utf-8?q?Guido_G=C3=BCnther?= <agx at sigxcpu.org>
Subject: Bug#844511: fixed in libvirt 2.4.0-3
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:19:07 +0000
Size: 5760
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-libvirt-maintainers/attachments/20161207/123056be/attachment-0001.mht>