[Pkg-libvirt-maintainers] libvirt + AppArmor in Stretch vs. merged-/usr

[Guido Günther]

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 04:17:40PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> two commits of mine made it into the upstream master branch, but
> they're not part of 2.5.0:
> 
>   commit a73e7037e5a5f7af94216e2147c6ef675b2323f6
>   Author: intrigeri <intrigeri+libvirt at boum.org>
>   Date:   Mon Dec 12 10:59:32 2016 +0000
>   
>       AppArmor: allow QEMU to set_process_name.
>       
>       https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369281
>       
>       Acked-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.co>
>   
>   commit de79efdeb8558bbdb3677dbcaaebf7c50cb3bab4
>   Author: intrigeri <intrigeri at debian.org>
>   Date:   Sat Dec 3 18:32:48 2016 +0000
>   
>       AppArmor policy: support merged-/usr.
>       
>       Acked-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.co>
> 
> Will Stretch be shipped with an AppArmor newer than 2.5, or should
> I prepare a branch that imports these commits in debian/patches/?

I was aiming for 2.6 but it depends a bit when it will be released.
Cheers,
 -- Guido